“But woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites!…woe to you, blind guides…You blind fools!…You blind men!…You serpents, you brood of vipers, how are you to escape being sentenced to hell?” (Matt. 23:13–34, NJB.)
“Well then, just as the darnel is gathered up and burnt in the fire, so it will be at the end of time. The Son of Man will send his angels and they will gather out of his kingdom all things that provoke offences and all who do evil, and throw them into the blazing furnace, where there will be weeping and grinding of teeth” (Matt. 13:40–43, NJB.)
“Next he will say to those on his left hand ‘Go away from me with your curse upon you, to the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels’’’ (Matt. 25:41, NJB.)
His threats raise five key issues:
First, he would’ve had no need to intimidate people if he’d made a convincing case for himself. The implication that those who offended him would incur retribution (argumentum ad baculum, or literally an “argument with a cudgel”) means he resorted to intimidation after he’d failed to convince them. I think biblical authors were browbeating people who balked at joining their new cult.
Second, Jesus claimed that the love of the divine arbitrator was only granted to those who behaved. Most people today say that true, real love, such that a parent has for a child, is unconditional. In Jesus’ scheme, God is a petty, vindictive dictator who threatens his own creation, hardly the loving character he’s made out to be.
Third, these quotes confuse Jesus’ doctrine. He advised people to love their enemies, bless those that curse them, and forgive seventy times seven times, so he hardly set an example by blackmailing people with threats of hell.
Fourth, one wonders on what basis God decides who goes to hell? There must be borderline cases. Some Christians claim that people choose hell by “rejecting Jesus.” What does that mean? What about those who’ve never heard of him? Some state we have to “accept Jesus” to avoid hell. “Accepting Jesus” means being compliant. Church people know how to create, then calm, newcomers’ fears—mention hell and then convince them to embrace Jesus and conform.
Fifth, it’s highly unlikely that the real Jesus, who would have been a dyed in the wool Jew, would have believed in hell. Jews never have, and still don’t, preach about such a place. The Old Testament does teach that there’s life after death, specifically that every single soul goes to a graveyard called Sheol. (http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/13563-sheol). The wicked are there (Ps. 9:17, 31:17, 49:14, Isa. 5:14,) and so are the righteous (Gen. 37:35; Job 14:13; Ps. 6:5, 16:10, 88:3; Isa. 38:10.) It’s not somewhere a soul is sent if it’s behaved badly. “Sheol” is sometimes incorrectly translated as “hell” in the Old Testament. Yet Sheol is a proper noun, so is a name or title. It shouldn’t be translated but simply transliterated, as is done with other names. The literal meaning is simply “subterranean retreat.” Anything more is conjecture and speculation.
Many church people still preach hellfire to children who don’t have the maturity to realise it’s nonsense. Right now, there are children lying in bed trembling at the idea that the devil wants to drag them to Hell. This is psychological bullying, nothing less than child abuse.
Some adults still have vivid childhood memories of being terrified by the immense, unending pain in hell, and still shudder when they think of such a place.
In the past, churches used hell to justify terrible behavior. They thought it gave them license to burn any helpless person they didn’t like; that they were just beginning the roasting, on earth, that Satan was to continue for all eternity.
For centuries the Catholic church preached about purgatory, a holding pen where sinful, but not really sinful Christians will find themselves after death, where fire might wash them free of sin. It was like a half way house to hell.
The popery procured vast profits by selling indulgences to vulnerable bereaved people in the belief the money would let loose souls out of purgatory. The living, filled with anxiety for their deceased relations, paid the church so their loved one would move more quickly through to heaven. What a profitable scam! With a credulous populace, it was a license to print money. This contemptible practice became one of the triggers for the reformation.
The concept of an eternal painful punishment is immoral. It’s obviously one of the weakest Christian teachings because it threatens a postmortem punishment that the church never has to enforce. Just like heaven, noone’s ever come back from the dead to tell us all about it. It’s a very easy way to make people compliant, if they’re gullible enough to believe it. Hell Is quite rightly an embarrassment to many modern Christians, who choose to ignore Jesus’ words by not talking about this ancient/medieval mandate any more.